03-11-2011,02:20 PM

Originally Posted by
sharkey35
Mike,
I was a little surprised by your comments in another thread that the Ping Eye 2's were some of the best irons ever (figured you as a blade guy, not sure why). Could you give us a sense of why you feel that way? Are you not impressed with iron designs over the last 20 + years?
Bobby Clampett is critical of "game improvement" clubs and has a theory that they can actually hurt your game. There is a lot of debate on equipment forums as to whether a weekend player should be playing with anything resembling a blade. Your thoughts?
Any thoughts on forged vs. cast.
I am currently in the camp of the head not making a huge difference (among quality products) but the shaft being much more important.
Bob
Bob,
Figured me as a blade guy? I used to play with the Hogan Red Lines of the late 1980's, first official set that I got and used them on and off with Tommy Armour 845's for a long time. After that went through all kinds of clubs, not really for my own game but to try them out for curiosity more than anything. Ping Eye2's are hard to beat, gotta be one of the all time best selling irons. As you asked, definitely not impressed with iron club designs over the past years. I go to the PGA show every year and walk the line at the Demo Day and see every vendor and they all look the same year after year. It is a little ridiculous how they come out with a new model every 6 weeks as opposed to ones like the Ping Eye 2 and designs that lasted years. I see no need for changing iron models that rapidly, we have our 2 models of Explosive Designs and I see no need for any adjustments anytime soon. Our 'Core' game improvement iron is a huge success, everyone has given good feedback.
When you start to discuss iron head design the amount of offset between the center of mass of the club head and the shaft is a very big factor when you are selecting the head shape of your choice. Traditional club talk always talks about the offset of the clubs but I am not so sure they have educated the public on exactly how it effects the impact. The more offset, the further back the center of gravity is placed from the shaft. As the club approaches the ball, the center of gravity of the head is going to make the shaft deflect so that it pulls in line with the hands. The more offset will there create more 'dynamic loft' and more 'dynamic close' - this means the club head is going to want to tilt back as the center of gravity seeks to line up and also the toe of your club will also deflect down slightly and create a 'closing' of the face. This phenomenon is unavoidable and is much more exaggerated when you swing a driver because the club head is bigger and the center of gravity of the club head is much further back from the shaft.
You will often find better players wanting to avoid the extra offset in their irons as they want to remove the variability of the extra 'closing' and 'loft' increase. It is however, easy to see the benefits for the beginner or high handicap golfer by gaining assistance through extra loft and extra face closing.
Cast vs Forged - a matter of personal preference and choice, golfer feel is going to be a very personal choice. Cost is also a factor as forged clubs go through more of a development process and therefore has more of a cost. FYI, I play a cast club.
I don't agree with HEAD not making a difference and the SHAFT being most important. This is a very common myth in golf, shafts selection is much more of a function of weight and golfer preference. The whole SHAFT FLEX FREQUENCY stuff is a complete farce. It may have some merit as a point of reference but has no use when a club is in the golfer's hands. Putting a club in a VISE and getting a frequency means nothing to the golfer with the club in their hands. The shaft will affect the amount of dynamic loft gain or close, so shafts really only can help you orientate the club face, they offer no kick or speed gain.
You may find these things different from what you normally here, but those are the real facts. Also, gives you a little bit of the information that I will be publishing, Should lead to an interesting discussion one day
Michael Jacobs
PGA TEACHER OF THE YEAR
2012 Metropolitan Section